Welcome! Avery T. "Sandy" Waterman, Jr. is distinguished as a mediation, settlement, trial and appellate lawyer at Patten, Wornom, Hatten & Diamonstein, L.C. in Newport News, Virginia. He has settled, tried, appealed and won the most nursing home and medical malpractice cases in the law firm and is referred cases by other attorneys across Virginia.

July 15, 2010

Virginia: Brain Injury – a Lawyer’s Hearings

On July 15, 2010, the brain injury case of Gagnon v. Burns, No. CL08-572, was heard in Circuit Court for Gloucester County, Virginia, on various pre-trial Motions. In Gagnon, the Plaintiff student was injured seriously when he was attacked by another student at Gloucester High School, despite yet another student having warned Assistant Principal Burns of the impending hours beforehand.

Defendant Burns had moved the Court to keep from the jury a SPECT scans, which showed an abnormality in the Plaintiff brain injury victim. Among other things, however, Mr. Waterman presented medical literature in Gagnon supporting that the SPECT scan was accepted and reliable for diagnosing brain injury; so the defense conceded that the SPECT scan presented a jury issue.

A damage claim of $9,350,000.00 is at issue in Gagnon. Trial of the merits of the brain injury claim is scheduled for August 16-27, 2010.

June 30, 2010

Virginia: MySpace Messaging - a Lawyer’s Proof

On June 23, 2010, The Daily Press headlined “Gloucester schools trial set for August” and subtitled “Former student seeking millions after fight left him injured”. The article covered hearing on June 23, 2010, for the brain injury case of Gagnon v. Burns, No. CL08-572 in Circuit Court for Gloucester County, Virginia.

At prior companion hearing in the Gagnon brain injury suit on June 10, 2010, Defendant Burns unsuccessfully tried to resist Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration, which the Court granted. At follow-up hearing on June 22, 2010, Defendant Burns unsuccessfully tried again to resist the Court entering the Order that memorialized its ruling in favor of Plaintiff on June 10, 2010.

Defendant Burns repeatedly had sought to have the Court deem admitted his assertion that the Plaintiff brain injury victim had sent offensive instant messaging on his MySpace account to his assailant, James Newsome. Significantly, however, the Court instead found that the evidence presented by Mr. Waterman at the day-long hearing on December 16, 2009, actually strongly indicated that his client, Greg Gagnon, did not send the disputed instant messaging.

First, Plaintiff’s expert attested on December 16th that the brain injury victim’s computer was infected with Spyware. Such Spyware permitted remote access to the victim’s MySpace, Yahoo and all other accounts by any third-party hacker.

Second, the testimony of the brain injury victim, both of his parents, his girlfriend and another friend on December 16th – which was unopposed and unopposable in fact – proved that it was physically impossible for Gagnon to have sent the disputed MySpace instant messaging on the day he was attacked. All witnesses testified consistently that at the time the instant messaging was launched on his MySpace account, the brain injury victim had just returned from the Emergency Room and was with them, laying on the couch in the living room (versus on the computer in his bedroom,), recovering from severe head injuries suffered in the attack, under the influence of prescription medication, and not even thinking or talking straight.

June 15, 2010

Virginia: Medical Malpractice “Privilege” – a Lawyer’s Vindication

On June 15, 2010, Sentara Williamsburg Community Hospital finally provided the Plaintiff patient its 12-page computer database printout by Risk Management. Sentara produced that patient record the week before Patient’s Motion to Enforce Va. Code Ann. §8.01-413(C) Subpoena was scheduled to be heard in the medical malpractice case of Marshall v. Moniz, No. CL08-2018 in Circuit Court for York County and Poquoson, Virginia.

Sentara’s 12-page computer database printout initially was protected in the patient’s predecessor suit, until Mr. Waterman sought rehearing. That companion medical malpractice suit was Marshall v. Sentara Health Sys. in Circuit Court for the City of Williamsburg and James City County, Virginia.

Marshall v. Moniz is scheduled for jury trial in mid-2011. Plaintiff patient has incurred more than $1,000,000.00 in medical bills and seeks $12,350,000.00 in compensation for alleged medical malpractice.

June 10, 2010

Virginia: Discovery Rulings - a Lawyer’s Motions

On June 10, 2010, multiple discovery issues were heard in the brain injury suit of Gagnon v. Burns, No. CL08-572 in Circuit Court for Gloucester County, Virginia. The Court first granted Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration and vacated its prior ruling that incorrectly had deemed certain Requests for Admission admitted when, in fact, the evidence presented by Mr. Waterman at hearing on December 16, 2009, strongly indicated that Plaintiff victims had a reasonable basis for denying the Requests as they did.

The Court in the Gagnon brain injury case also granted in part a Motion to Quash Subpoenas to NetZero and Verizon Wireless. The federal Stored Communication Act, 18 U.S.C. §2702-2703, prohibits producing the contents of a user’s private mail messages or stored content files.

May 29, 2010

Virginia: Medical Malpractice – a Lawyer’s Suit

On May 26, 2010, Mr. Waterman filed the medical malpractice suit of Myron M. Arshan, Executor of the Estate of Sharon Lorrie Britt, Deceased v. Stephen E. Plotnick, M.D., et al., No. CL10000619-00 in Circuit Court for the City of Williamsburg and James City County, Virginia. On May 29, 2010, The Daily Press headlined “$10.35 million malpractice suit filed against doctor in James City woman’s death: Complaint alleges doctor prescribed powerful narcotic cocktail that led to death of 44-year old woman;” and The Virginia Gazette variously headline “Suit: Prescriptions killed local woman $10 million sought from Va. Beach doctor” on its front page and “Suspended” on page 7A.

May 26, 2010

Virginia: Spousal Support – a Lawyer’s Consent

On May 26, 2010, a Consent Order was entered in the special case of Parker v. Parker, No.CL09-1403 in the Circuit Court for the City of Williamsburg and James City County, Virginia. Prior to hearing on the merits, the defense capitulated to Mr. Waterman’s Plaintiff client, consenting to the termination of spousal support sought.

May 5, 2010

Virginia: Auto Accident Settlement – a Lawyer’s Deal

On May 4, 2010, Mr. Waterman settled another vehicle accident claim. He was able to do so without filing suit.

A resident living in Newport News was involved in a vehicle accident occurring in Loundon County. Modern communications make it easy for a Mr. Waterman to handle distant cases.

If you or a loved one are victim of a vehicle accident, brain injury, or wrongful please contact Avery T. "Sandy" Waterman, Jr., Esq. in Newport News or Williamsburg, Virginia, at 888.881.7881, 757.881.9881 or contact him online. Historic results do not guarantee future performance.

April 26, 2010

Virginia: Attorneys Fees, Costs and Expenses – a Lawyer’s Award

On April 26, 2010, Mr. Waterman prevailed on Motion to Correct Award Calculation and for Additional Attorney’s Fees at telephone hearing in the special case of Gary W. Routson v. Helen E. Routson, No. CL09-2620 in York County and Poquoson Circuit Court. His client was awarded an additional $3,004.00 in attorneys fees plus $1,601.05 in out-of-pocket costs advanced.

That brings the total net award of attorneys, costs and expenses in Routson to $25,579.18. Plaintiff in that Yorktown special case also was awarded a net principal amount of $66,482.07 and was relieved of another $100,000.00+ in future tax-free payment liability.

April 23, 2010

Virginia: Who’s Who – a Lawyer’s Invitations

In April, 2010, Williamsburg and Newport News attorney, Avery T. “Sandy” Waterman, Jr., Esq., was invited to be listed in Who’s Who Among Law Professionals and in Who’s Who Among Executives and Professionals. Mr. Waterman has accepted these professional recognitions, so should appear in the upcoming volumes.

April 13, 2010

Virginia: Proof of Cohabitation - a Lawyer’s Victory

On April 13, 2010, after a two-day trial, Mr. Waterman prevailed in the special case of Gary W. Routson v. Helen E. Routson, No. CL09-2620 in Circuit Court for York County, Virginia. His client was refunded almost $85,000.00 in payments made under protest, awarded over $20,000.00 in attorneys fees, and relieved of more than $100,000.00 in potential future payments.

Plaintiff in Routson had been required by agreement to make substantial tax-free monthly payments, except if his ex-spouse habitually cohabitated in a relationship analogous to marriage for a year. That disqualifying cohabitation was proved by a preponderance of the evidence in this special case, as the Court refused to reward Mrs. Routson for temporary separation that camouflaged her ongoing romantic relationship.

April 8, 2010

Virginia: Auto Accident Settlements – a Lawyer’s Negotiation

On April 8, 2010, Mr. Waterman negotiated a pair of settlements in companion vehicle accident cases in Circuit Court for Mathews County, Virginia. They are Suzanne Sopko v. Phyllis Lewis and Patrick Sopko v. Phyllis Lewis, Nos. CL10-02 and CL10-01.

The underlying vehicle accident in Sopko occurred in 2007. The suits initially filed for their claims were non-suited and then refiled to allow for protracted medical treatment for continuing personal injuries

March 10, 2010

Virginia: Vehicle Accident Settlement – a Lawyer’s Compromise

Last week, Mr. Waterman obtained a six-figure settlement for a local vehicle accident victim. The case is Garrity v. Jones, No. 1341 in Circuit Court for York/Poquoson, Virginia.

The underlying collision in Garrity occurred in Yorktown, Virginia. The vehicle accident victim underwent physical therapy and orthopaedic surgery.