Virginia Injury Attorney Blog

On August 31, 2011, Mr. Waterman and opposing counsel argue Gagnon v. Burns before a writ panel of the Virginia Supreme Court in Richmond, Virginia. Both parties have petitioned to appeal different aspects of the brain injury case in which Gloucester County jury awarded approximately $6,100,000.00.

In Record No. 110754 of Gagnon, Defendant Travis Burns raises four points that he claims require reversal of his liability finding. In companion Record No. 110767, Mr. Waterman raised the issue of joint and several liability, arguing that the Plaintiff brain injury victim of assault and battery is entitled to collect the full damages award against the Defendant Assistant Principal at Gloucester High School, who enjoys $6,000,000.00 in insurance coverage.

In Virginia, parties to personal injury suits are not guaranteed an appeal from the trial court. The brain injury litigant in Gagnon likely will be advised in September which, if any, issues will be granted a writ of certiorari by the Virginia Supreme Court.

Cabiness v. Medical Facilities of Am. VIII (8), L.P., 80 Va. Cir. 425 (Danville Jun. 21, 2010) is a medical malpractice action. It overruled the Demurrer to plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages.

Cabiness found that the First Amended Complaint set forth sufficient facts supporting “willful and wanton negligence”. Id. at 433. Based on plaintiff’s pleading of medical malpractice, “a reasonable jury could conclude that the defendants were actually aware, from their knowledge of existing circumstances and conditions, that their contact probably would cause some injury to another and that despite such actual knowledge, they consciously disregarded the probably harm to the plaintiff.” Id.

This month Mr. Waterman settled a pending but unserved vehicle accident lawsuit. The two-car crash occurred in York County and involved residents of Yorktown and Newport News, Virginia.

The victim was traveling on State Route 622 (Brick Church Road) with the right-of-way through its intersection with State Route 17 (George Washington Highway) when broadsided by the offending motorists who ran a redlight. The car accident impact was severe enough to overturn the victim’s vehicle onto its roof.

Gibson v. Medical Facilities of America, Inc., 80 Va. Cir. 56 (Norfolk Jan. 22, 2010) is a medical malpractice case. It resolved issues of venue and an arbitration clause in favor of the nursing home resident, a victim of sexual molestation.

First, Gibson held there was permissive venue based on Medical Facilities of America (“MFA”) regularly conducting substantial business in Norfolk. It sufficed that MFA was sole general partner in the limited liability partnership that owned a healthcare facility in Norfolk, despite the alleged medical malpractice being committed at another facility in Chesapeake. Id. at 58.

Second, Gibson held: “The Court has discretion in determining whether the defendant has demonstrated good cause to transfer, and the plaintiff’s forum selection should be given favor.” Id. The requisite “good cause” for transferring the case to Chesapeake (where the medical malpractice occurred) was not shown because there was “no demonstration of substantial inconvenience to the parties or witnesses” by the case being in Norfolk. Id. at 59.

Third, Gibson held another defendant was not entitled to transfer venue of the medical malpractice case, despite not having any personal connection to Norfolk. “Venue is proper to all defendants if it is proper to one defendant.” Id.

Fourth, Gibson denied MFA’s motion to compel arbitration of the medical malpractice claim. “When the plaintiff brings an action in tort rather than contract, asserts no claim under the contract, and does not require the existence of the contract to proceed, the arbitration provision of the contract is not applicable to the controversy.” Id. at 63.

Mr. Waterman’s Gloucester County brain injury case, Gagnon v. Burns, Record Nos. 110754 and 110767, has been scheduled for oral arguments before a writ panel of the Virginia Supreme Court on August 31, 2011. Both parties have been granted 10 minutes on their respective Petitions for Appeal.

Since there is no appeal of right to the Virginia Supreme Court in personal injury cases, a petitioning party must be granted a writ of certiorari for an appeal. The parties in the Gagnon brain injury lawsuit likely will receive decision on whether either or both will be granted an appeal (and, if so, on what issues) a couple months after their oral arguments.

In Gagnon, a Gloucester jury awarded $5,000,000.00 in principal and pre-judgment interest of approximately $1,100,000.00 to Mr. Waterman’s brain injury client. It found the assailant, his instigating sister, and a negligent Assistant Principal at Gloucester High School liable.

Kudos to the Honorable Ronald E. Wilson, Judge of the 1st Judicial Circuit, sitting as temporary Justice on the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia! On July 21, 2011, he authored a most courageous cogent dissent in the medical malpractice case of MacDonald v. City Hospital, Inc., No. 35543.

Judge/Justice Wilson in MacDonald wrote a no-holds-barred dissenting opinion that exposed medical malpractice “cap” legislation for exactly what it is. He also appropriately challenged the state’s highest court to uphold its judicial responsibility and declare the statute unconstitutional on multiple grounds.

There has been some suggestion that his brilliant dissent may prompt West Virginia’s Supreme Court to reconsider the constitutionality. Better yet, perhaps the MacDonald medical malpractice appeal will be taken to the United States Supreme Court!

On August 2, 2011, Mr. Waterman was invited by the Honorable Stephen C. Moore to join as a Master member of the I’Anson-Hoffman American Inn of Court XXVII. Membership is extended only to a select few within the Hampton Roads legal community.

I’Anson-Hoffman is our region’s Inn and is affiliated with the Marshall-Wythe School of Law at the College of William and Mary. Its membership levels are Judicial, Masters, Barristers, Associates, Professors, and Students.

The Inn is dedicated to, and has a long distinguished history of, promoting the goals of excellence, civility, professionalism and ethics within the legal profession. Members attend socials, dinners, speakers and programs.

The first Inn of Court was established in 1292 in England by King Edward I. The American Inns of Court Foundation was organized in 1985, and I’Anson-Hoffman was chartered in 1987.

Mr. Waterman now is slated to speak on February 15, 2012, in New Orleans, Louisiana at the Annual Convention of the Southern Trial Lawyers Association (“STLA”). His personal injury topic is “Cameos for Neutralizing the Defense Expert” within the theme of “Tactics, Techniques or Strategies I Developed in a Recent Case and How It Affected Outcome”.

Mr. Waterman has been a member of STLA for over a decade. Its select membership is drawn from Virginia and a dozen other southeast states.